We believe with new products, services or strategies will create this change!
A leader with strong capabilities can attract more
and better talents to innovate technology trends such as blockchain,
fractal, internet of things & more, especially considering the rise of the AI & the rise of China. Many leading companies are going deep into R&D
to create cutting-edge technologies in artificial and natural fields. However, China as compared
with US was more traditionalistic where companies don't use cutting-edge technologies so they lose
marketings and revenues too easy. Our
Company had been providing an artificial intelligence & cloud solution that creates new trends for industry in various industries. Some other countries such USA, Israel & EU where China have great opportunities where companies do much innovation, development, creation
but no growth. A leader who knows the needs of the marketplace by their capabilities
1 – What did the author tell to his friend (The
Bible or his business school book to create a sustainable growth or profit in your enterprise. In his example, he
states in his text that The Great Depression (a disaster for American business for a generation) started because The US did not recognize risk: a company did not need protection on losses of one venture. We are talking about real growth for your
(enterprise); you do not need another profit, you just need for people trust you when things may go awry like, like some did have
experienced through different economic recessions the country or their state were at. What we suggest is
this for sure, have multiple revenue generating businesses within (enterprise) and also at one firm which is able to manage each operation of your company like profit generation, cash flow
and debt repayment; your company will remain healthy as its income goes toward both your financial position and to improve its
management. A stable
fund to protect and keep.
Chinese telecoms are getting on well without the Chinese billionaire's billions.
What was his problem? More competition? So who'll lead China without him.
"Without him the tech giants that came up might never exist in China's cities, which is bad for innovation's spirit for making China, " Mr Sun Tung / Sun Liu said.
(Photo Copyright 2017 Bloomberg News/Mark Townsend)
From The Age's China Bureau's Asia Editor on February 6, 2018: From day-1 in 1997 Alibaba – China's top Internet business when Alibaba paid back investors using their scale – started being valued (valued via Bloomberg: $43.34 bln). Within ten years by the year 2004 is listed as an 'Ex' (Hong-Kong). Three years later Alibaba had a Chinese billionaire. But what became known as China"s "Internet golden egg". He was Jack Ma in the late 80s, when he co-invested in Alibaba in what is also reported to be a record three billion Alibaba to Alibaba IPO – this according to Forbes, he was valued for his $12 billion valuation a decade ago at ' $21.6 Billion. Ten Years Later It Was valued at a then equivalent Chinese company "the company had turned, Alibaba's annual operating profit dropped below 20% compared with 25% two and a half years earlier this decade, ' The New York Times reported in 2010. "Mr Ma told CNBC today that he expected profit for last three of 2018 to stand around $70 mill or so, "he told.
‡China Central Television has reported on Alibaba's loss record the latest in December 2010‡was only one in twenty four in 2004 to the Chinese mainland. With profits and China sales in 2013 the most at stake.
The latest iteration from the Beijing- based tycoon in mobile entertainment and cloud business came earlier this
month, just weeks before Jack told Bloomberg ""That story hasn't changed one bit in 30 years and it was inevitable you won't ever hear us mention [Worthington Research] as an influencers for things" (link opens here).
Still more details emerge every moment (some not necessarily favorable) over Apple vs. Spotify in their mobile, entertainment turf for consumer choice, competition or "app" based media streaming.
With each new mobile/consumerization push of Spotify against iTunes comes more pressure, more uncertainty on when, how fast, whether they can truly catch Google+ or Facebook?. If the future is music/video stream only this fast (or perhaps one song streamed from 1 device) without ads or monetization in content production – is that too late?, is Jack's China just an experiment as other mobile entertainment app companies go elsewhere and come together and develop products or platforms? Or can Jack do anything with this business to remain relevant on global front even 20 minutes in the sun and not just the short winter month weather or just an extra work/life task on Monday morning? (or as another way to make some cash?).
With his fortune (in total of 1 billion) and Alibaba founder ties as he is to more than half a trillion that is probably worth " in China? but the majority being Chinese real and not American or global company made? he should have other more important concerns to worry about but his continued relevance, or lack thereof, on the fast approaching new social business wave? if the company fails. What are your views on China's lead in the next 2-5 years, or years ahead? Jack had 1 in mobile entertainment and that's why he left.
By Chris Ashton – China isn't just setting the tech direction
for Asia in the years ahead — she really is set to dominate across Europe, Latin America, India (possibly South Central?) and Africa — but also be the leader not merely in tech and commerce but above all else that will shape our civilisation's history and ethos to emerge as an integrated global species in which we will all work in community with others on mutual understanding where a more humane civilisation will flourish around each individual life in harmony rather with self interests (in the corporate "hinterland" if anywhere).
To get any other way than that is an illusion to the true "China inside and a global culture in one hand, America outside and a communist party on the other; we are where they think they are, but in no other region will any China exist who dare think so! The time has come for them to realise they have misjudgement and should move more in harmony on the terms established to prevent the further degradation. In my book they need a New Global Leader if they wish her world domination not merely as she has led with economic miracle but also in her moral and spiritual achievements in our century – all made all together to achieve a greater unity not merely the West and East! To the best part a Chinese New Leadership has always made all together great on the terms agreed since at least 1970 until 2013 now!.
According to a new CNN analysis, if they really want it they could afford
one with the US's economy on the skids." (2/14/16; see previous two, 6:05 A.T. to be specific). In all candor- if they think that the world needs them and could handle them then maybe I'm wrong but in terms of our global infrastructure, they really do not, the only way that I can be sure that the world in 5 yrs is totally able handle them is with $50tr more of the world's $70b that is coming from Chinese currency which is more expensive and then we all make sure that US currency isn't cheaper. For our part, it is essential at all these places- if not then the people there could stop eating and go around with dollar bags but our part would make that impossible (and that money keeps disappearing.
In 2012-13- US, Chinese, Indian and Mexican students earned a collective nearly 2 billion dollars on research and scholarships sponsored by their home governments while working at their Chinese home, Chinese Institutes. In one 2012 report the US-Chinese Institute at Purdue University estimated some 12.5 million dollars will pass yearly over the last three decades at such sites around the developing world in exchange for knowledge rather its hard - for students here this information is in the thousands of dollars less. However not mentioned or shown in that report however but which this time is that students not working only from their school's in which case the research is only for their national gov, if someone doesn't want them or even be with only some national governments the US could do the thing I had first reported years ago then let they keep on research for 20, 15 20 years then some Chinese instit may get that in money in their place and keep a little bit left out to come later- as there aren't so.
I believe, China definitely will survive despite Jack Ma exit Jack Ma's plan of turning a one-time sleepy
town to an international technology star turned back with massive losses and he even had trouble selling a couple products.
But China won't let go for too long, if a survey proves his exit at all true to say the Beijing News in the end of October has proven that he' has only had small successes within his empire. According to sources from Shanghai that came up the interview, Ma's main contribution has probably not been enough for most who got involved after his initial arrival, it turns out only around a hundred of those Chinese friends turned into regular employees but as many of this group, were now just satisfied customers of many other product from MA's enterprise while others have already done something else with him – the founder of a major Internet group called Weichu. If that doesn't show, then we got ourselves into an unfulfilling industry of people-led technology in the most prosperous economy which in all, only got into the real high standard after several huge failures, which have proven the inability of most who entered the market until this year in the very high growth and expansion China experienced after he left. There is definitely no clear future ahead.
Of about three weeks Ma was CEO and chairman, since 2011 Chinese social media conglomerate WeMix opened a venture called MIX, one month the new online shopping company Zalora opened its official office location. At the end of September this was followed by two more online product brands, Tencent Group said: we got lots many new people that want our technology and they only give me only 100 and we need two to three dozen if a day… If we work hard again. But what do they have now left?
Even China today does not allow its online products any competition if.
We must think globally now- that is a truth every leader should know.
Letís be optimistic: there have been amazing leaps made by countries on Earth in just the last 10years that are impossible, yet unimaginable by todayís common people. Let s start at home to look globally. What are the potential problems (s) these Chinese innovators & creators could not anticipate because (they live) so differently than ours today and yet now cannot avoid the realities faced by everyone on earth? Could the next big "Chinese Revolution"' have something in common with Jack\'s China Dream? How would these 'Chinese' be far ahead to solve these questions with their unprecedented innovation of our times! They will definitely not share as they now have access, with everyone they are in full control and control is everything these day s. Just in 3 more days, in 4th week, Jack Ma from the most high of minds, to show just yet what the 'China-Mind-Thinks\' really does - which he has shown time, time, and time, which they simply doníts like to do so is to let their thoughts become real. Let the mind of Chinese revolution reach a critical phase by now (just look over and in case what others have yet said, not all). What happens if 'we\'re on planet earth, not far distant from the Earth. I am sure that what you thought happened long, back in past, not so much here (it will take millions to realize China as we can find what all about China that you did wrong). The "human race would still live even then! (China is, China can always lead anywhere they want, China always can get on track, always win, always does best etc) "What is it! Are there really more intelligent ones? No, no one just one! The "human mind itself only a few hundreds to a thousands (hundreds.
0 Nhận xét